Political
scholars’ views regarding role of principle of majority in the process of political
decision-making in an Islamic state are polarized into two extremes. One group
opines that political decision-making in an Islamic state is to be done by only
eligible people/ the people showing sufficient knowledge and piety. The other
group advocates the right of common people to participate in the process of
political decision-making. In the succeeding lines, we would thrash out this
issue in the light of Islamic injunctions.
In
fact, in Islam, the process of political decision-making is mainly divided into
two stages. The first stage is pertaining to common people without
discrimination; and the second stage is relating to specified persons/people.
In
respect of first stage i.e. relating to common people’s
decision-making, we have seen in "Islamic Political System-its main contours (1)" that primarily
decision-making in an Islamic political system is to be done on the basis of
principle of majority, but the majority opinion has to be in line with Quran
and sunnah. In other words, Islam does not debar majority people from taking
part in the process of decision-making, rather makes it compulsory for the
people to take part in the process of decision-making. However the opinion
reached at by the majority people has to be in accordance with Islamic
injunctions. All texts/ sayings of our Nabi (saw) in favor of principle of
majority, quoted in that article, are reiterated below to elaborate
this point.
“Whatever the
Muslims hold to be good is good before Allah”;
“My followers
will never agree upon what is wrong”;
“It is incumbent
upon you to follow the most numerous body”;
Form
these above quoted texts, it is clear that principle of majority has been given
sanctity in Islam (if decision reached at is not contradictory to Quran and
sunnah). But what is to be noted is that people’s participation is a must to
constitute a majority; majority cannot be formulated without participation of all (at
least majority) people in the process. In other words, a majority (of all Muslims) emerged
without participation of at least majority people in the process would not be a
majority given sanctity in Islam. It means in order to avail blessings attached
with the majority (of all Muslims), Muslims are obliged to formulate majority by taking part in the process of
decision-making, directly or indirectly, through the political system. In other
words, decision-making is a sacred trust given to Muslims which have to
dispense with this trust by constituting majority in the process of
decision-making. Islam makes it compulsory for the Muslims to take part in the
process of decision-making through formulating majority under the political
system.
Many
Quranic texts also make it compulsory for the Muslims to take part in the
process of decision-making. For instance all verses stating about ‘mutual
consultation’ bind the Muslims to get into process of political
decision-making.
“So pardon them and ask forgiveness for them and consult them in the
matter. And when you have decided, then rely upon Allah. Indeed, Allah loves
those who rely [upon Him]” (al-imran-159).
Allah has mentioned identity of
Muslims as “And those who have responded
to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by]
consultation among themselves…” (al-shura-38).
These
above mentioned verses make it mandatory for the Muslims to give their input
(directly or indirectly) in the process of political decision-making.
Similarly
all verses stating about ‘amr bil maroof wa nahe anil munkar’ and sura al-asr actually bind the
Muslims to become part of process of political decision-making. Obviously political field may not be left out of performance of obligation of 'amr bil maroof wa nahe anil munkar' and performance of 'tawasau bil haque and tawasau bil sabr'.
“You are the best nation produced [as an
example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong…”
(al-imran-110).
The individual aspect of this
obligation has been mentioned in Sura Luqman in which Hazrat Luqman advises his
son as follows:
“O my son, establish prayer, enjoin what is right, forbid what is
wrong, and be patient over what befalls you. Indeed, [all] that is of the
matters [requiring] determination(Luqman-17).
“By time. Indeed, mankind is in loss. Except such as have Faith, and do righteous deeds, and (join together) in the mutual teaching of Truth, and of Patience and Constancy” (al-asr).
“By time. Indeed, mankind is in loss. Except such as have Faith, and do righteous deeds, and (join together) in the mutual teaching of Truth, and of Patience and Constancy” (al-asr).
It
is important to note that No Quranic verse states about exclusion of
less wise/ less pious people from the process of mutual consultation or
absolves wicked persons from the duty of performance of ‘amr bil maroof wa nahe anil
munkar’ or performance of 'tawasau bil haque and tawasau bil sabr'. Muslims are under obligation to perform these duties in the field of political system as well. The reason is that even the most wicked person happens to be good in some matters; and the most noble person may be bad in some matters. In short, Quran and hadith allow/bind all Muslims to participate in the
political decision-making which involve all types of matters. Actually, there is another special reason for not excluding
any specific class from the process of political decision-making at the first
stage. That special reason is the provision of second stage i.e. relating to decision-making
by specified people. Because all people may not be equal in piety and
knowledge, decision-making at the first stage may be defective. In order to
remove deficiencies in the decision-making at the first stage, the second stage
of political decision-making is confined to only special people/ people having
required standard of piety and knowledge.
This second stage in political decision-making has been provided in the following texts:
This second stage in political decision-making has been provided in the following texts:
“O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those
in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah
and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the
best [way] and best in result” (al-nisa-59).
In this above quoted verse,
basic principle of conduct of Islamic state and Muslims has been given. Whether
the difference of opinion is between the Islamic state and the Muslims or it is
among the Muslims, the dispute will be resolved according to Quran and Sunnah.
Quran says: " And of the people is he who
disputes about Allah (His words) without knowledge or guidance or an
enlightening book [from Him]" (al-hajj-8). From this verse, it is
inferred that in order to declare any thing from Allah ( to declare Allah's intention),
the declaring person must be having knowledge; he must be rightly guided; and
his opinion must be based on Quran and Sunnah.
Our nabi (saw) states
" in a situation where you confront a matter of which no solution you find
in Quran and Sunnah, refer such matter to pious and Allah's obedients among
you, and it must be decided through consultation, and you must not decide it on
the basis of a single person's opinion".
From the above quoted
authorities, we may infer that, in order to make up inequalities among
Body of Muslims in terms of piety and knowledge, and deficiencies reflected at the first stage
of decision-making, a second stage for the decision-making has been provided,
in which most pious and scholar persons would participate. According to above mentioned hadith, the decision-making at the second stage also would
be based on consultation; the word 'consultation' implies that majority has the option not to accept the decision/solution made at the second stage (if there exist more than one Islamic solutions), but majority cannot adopt what has been declared wrong by the learned and pious people at the second stage.
During the initial period of Islamic history, first and
second stages were not distinguished; decision-making was made at the single
stage in which people of city state of Medina were allowed to participate in
the process of decision-making without any discrimination in terms of piety and
knowledge. There was no second stage of
decision-making at that time and decisions reached at were not reviewed at the
second stage. The reason is obvious; our Nabi (saw) himself participated in and
endorsed the decisions made at the first stage; there was no need to review
them at the second stage. The same
practice of decision-making at single stage continued during periods of four
Caliphs, and the second stage was not resorted to for the reason that Caliph,
along with men of piety and knowledge, himself participated in and endorsed the
decisions made at single stage. In other words, the decisions made by the
common people and rectification of such decisions by men of piety and knowledge
was done in the same single stage. This practice of decision-making at single
stage was possible at that time because all common people could not be involved
in the process of decision-making due to limited and inefficient means of
communication at that time. The decisions reached at by limited number of common
people which were able to participate in the process of decision-making could
be rectified by men of piety and knowledge at the same single stage. But now
that number of common people able to participate in the process of
decision-making is huge and decisions made by those common people cannot
possibly be rectified by men of piety and knowledge at the same single stage,
it is crying need of time to distinguish clearly and functionally first and
second stages of political decision-making.
It may also be noted that any political system, not drawing strength
from the common people, cannot survive long enough. We have seen collapse of
USSR only after seventy years of its inception; this political system was
relying on a specific class and not exacting power from the common people.
Similarly capitalist system is also bound to collapse due to the same
reasons. Islam remained a dominant power
of this world for one thousand years, because monarchy/khilafah was backed by common people;
monarchy/ khilafah was not only a system of selecting ruler/caliph but also a system of governance drawing strength from
common people.
We may conclude that Islam allow/ bind common people to
participate in the process of political decision-making without any
discrimination in terms of piety and knowledge. However defective decisions
made by common people are liable to be rectified by men of piety and knowledge.
The parliament and assemblies may be taken as symbol of common people’s
participation in the political decision-making; similarly ‘shura’ –as mentioned in my article "Islamic Political System-its main contours (3)" may be taken as symbol of men’s of piety and
knowledge participation in this process. That model of Islamic Political System,
as delineated in that article-i.e. Islamic Political System-its main contours (3)- may also lend continuity to the Islamic
political system envisaged by it, which cannot be lent for long enough period,
if political system is relying on a particular class (religious or secular
class).