secondriseofislam@blogspot.com

Wednesday, 4 January 2017

Nabuwwat and its Functions in the Light of Basic Islamic Beliefs (3)




‘Munkareen e hadith’  try to distort basic Islamic belief of Nabuwwah by confusing ‘Eman’ with the belief that a hadith is rightly associated with our Nabi s.a.w.w or not.  They plead if belief in a hadith is part of  Eman, a person’s Eman would tend to be decreased or increased depending upon the number of ‘ahadith’ he believes in as authentic ahadith. The ‘munkareen e hadith’ actually need to know there is a difference between function of nabuwwah and claimed result of function of nabuwwah. The function of nabuwwah is to interpret the revealed Book.  For the people who have not directly received hadith from our Nabi s.a.w.w, a hadith is a claimed result of function of nabuwwah. The BELIEF in function of nabuwwah is matter of Eman; whereas the belief whether a hadith- which is a claimed result of function of nabuwwah- is rightly associated with our Nabi s.a.w.w. or not, has nothing to do with Eman. In other words, ‘Eman’ does not decrease or increase depending upon the number of ahadith one believes in. 

Another argument put forth by ‘munkareen e hadith’ is that all meanings of Quran have been described in Quran; there was no need to describe these meanings outside the Quran. This is obviously a false view because we know only literal meanings of Quranic Words are found in Quran;  in-depth meanings and inter-related meanings of various verses are not found in Quran. In other words, overall understanding of Quran is not contained in the form of Quranic Words in Quran. Moreover, al-Qiyamah-19 states about the meanings of Quran. All Verses/Words contained in Quran are called Quran; it means the meanings of Quran (mentioned in al-Qiyamah-19) are different from the Verses/Words contained in the Quran. Actually these meanings of Quran have been revealed to our Nabi s.a.w.w. in the form of hadith. It does not mean no Quranic meanings have been described in Quran; obviously many verses/words of Quran are explained in the Quran, but point is that all meanings of Verses/ Words contained in Quran are not explained in the form of Verses/ Words of Quran; much greater part of Quranic meanings are explained in the form of ahadith which have been stated by our Nabi s.a.w.w. under the ‘wahi e khafi’.

‘Munkareen e hadith’ also object that ahadith are not Kalamullah and as such they cannot be taken as part of Deen. This objection is also baseless because ahadith are outcome of wahi e khafi. As meanings of Quran have been sent to our Nabi s.a.w.w by Allah (al-qiyamah-19) and interaction between Allah and Nabi s.a.w.w. is conducted only through wahi, it means Quranic meanings were sent to our Nabi s.a.w.w. through wahi which is called wahi e Khafi/ ghair matlu. Allah speaks to prophets through two kinds of wahi; first is in the form of Words of Allah (e.g. a Book/Quran); the second is in the form of Allah’s Ideas which are translated by Gabriel (a.s) or by the prophet (a.s) himself. This second type of wahi results in Hadith. Both types of wahi- whether resulting in Quran or Hadith- are Kalamullah with the difference that Quran is Kalamullah as well as Words of Allah; whereas Hadith is Kalamullah but words of Nabi s.a.w.w. or words of Gabriel (a.s). The distinction between ‘kalam/Idea’ and Words may be appreciated by the example of deaf and dumb person. A deaf and dumb person speaks to us by making certain gestures; it is ‘kalam’/ Idea of that person. When we translate those gestures in our own words, it still remains kalam/ Idea of that deaf and dumb person though the words are ours. It is possible that we may commit mistake in translating gestures of deaf and dumb; but a Nabi (a.s) cannot commit mistake in understanding wahi. A wahi is impressed upon the Nabi's (a.s) mind/qalb; it means wahi is  understood by the Nabi (a.s) correctly; it is duty of Allah and Gabriel (a.s) to impress wahi upon the Nabi's (a.s) mind 100% correctly. (For details plz see https://secondriseofislam.blogspot.com/2014/03/concept-of-infallibility-of-prophet-and_8.html).

‘Munkareen e hadith’ view that Quran can be interpreted through Quran and as such no external source is required to interpret Quran. By adopting this view, they neglect dozens of Quranic verses which dictate people not only to follow the Book/ Quran but also to obey our Nabi s.a.w.w. Quran specifically orders the people to follow the person of our Nabi s.a.w.w.(ale Imran-31). We have seen in the article  https://secondriseofislam.blogspot.com/2016/10/itbaa-e-nabi-second-name-of-deen-1.html that ‘ata,at/obedience’ is relating to what has been directed, but itba,a/following is relating to everything whether directed or not; it means we should follow each and every manner/saying/act of our nabi s.a.w.w. whether or not we have been specifically directed to follow such manner/saying/act of our nabi s.a.w.w. The result of following our Nabi s.a.w.w. is establishment of political, social, economic, moral and other aspects of collective life according to the wahi received by our Nabi s.a.w.w.

Aother objection raised by the 'munkareen e hadith' is if hadith was part of Deen, why our Nabi .sa.w.w. has not got ahadith written in his age? This objection is also futile. Our Nabi's (s.a.w.w.) nabuwwah is applied to all ages to come. It means the Quranic meanings revealed to our Nabi s.a.w.w. also apply to all ages to come till Qiyamah.The ahadith contain principles which apply to all life situations likely to be faced by human till Qiyamah. When a hadith is narrated, it contains not only the principle but also the background (in most cases) in which that principle is stated by our Nabi s.a.w.w. If ahadith were got written essentially under the direction of our Nabi s.a.w.w., the people might tend to apply the principles contained in ahadith only to the situations/backgrounds stated in the ahadith. Because such situations might not be more than a few thousands in written ahadith, the application of principles contained in ahadith would become confined to only those few thousands situations stated in ahadith. Because application of principles mentioned in ahadith are meant to be applied to all life situations likely to be faced by human till Qiyamah, the ahadith were not essentially got written by our Nabi s.a.w.w. so that Muslims of every age may apply the principles contained in ahadith to all the situations faced by them.
  
We have seen in the article https://secondriseofislam.blogspot.com/2016/07/change-and-changeability-in-islamic.html that throughout past fourteen centuries, collective Islamic thinking was always developed on the basis of Quran and Hadith. No doubt some minor groups in every age also developed such religious thinking which was contradictory to the collective Islamic thinking but such minority thinking always died down without attaining acceptance from the people. ‘Munkareen e Hadith’ are not a new phenomenon in terms of Idea; they were found almost in every age but never achieved widespread acclamation. In every age they caused rifts in Muslim societies and earned condemnation of people at large. The same is the fate of ‘munkareen e Hadith’ of present age. The major impact of religious thinking of such people is to make attempt for removing the person of our Nabi s.a.w.w. from our social, political, economic, and other spheres of collective life so that they may shape all these spheres of Muslims’ collective life according to their own will. They want to shape Muslims’ collective life according to their own intellect instead of according to the wahi received by our Nabi s.a.w.w. (continued).  


No comments:

Post a Comment