We have
already seen in my article ‘Imperatives of Pakistan's Foreign Policy that the major consideration of USA is to
prevent the probability of China emerging as economic and political super power
and Central Asian Muslim countries including Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan all
joining Chinese block. In the backdrop of this consideration, the USA may have
two opposite choices regarding Afghan situation. The first choice of USA
may be to oppose establishment of Islamic state in Afghanistan. The
pre-condition of such a choice would be installation of a USA friendly
government in Afghanistan so that USA’s regional
interests may be protected.
Such an option would be made viable
and achievable through winning over both Pakistan and India to favor this
policy option so that threat of emergence of China and Islamic block may be
addressed. For this purpose, Pak-India disputes would be resolved to keep, on
the one hand, Pakistan away from China and Chinese dependence and, on the other
hand, to encourage and enable Pakistan to fight Pakistani Taliban which are
aligned with Afghan Taliban to establish Islamic state in Afghanistan.
It
was also stated in the same article that in case of failure of first choice, the
second choice of USA may be to support Islamic state in Afghanistan,
provided such an Islamic state is anti-China and anti-Iran. The basic objective
behind such a policy option would be the same i.e. to undo the threat of
emergence of Chinese-Muslim block. To achieve objectives behind this policy
option, Taliban would be encouraged to enflame liberation movement in Chinese
province of Xinxiang. In order to make such a policy a success, Pak-India
disputes would be resolved so that Pakistan’s dependence over China may be
reduced to the minimum and resultantly Pakistan may not resist Islamic state of
Afghanistan’s anti-China role.
The
recent developments in Afghanistan may be appreciated in the backdrop of the
geo-strategic scenario delineated above.
The
USA seems to have failed in achieving its first policy option in Afghanistan.
As mentioned earlier, one objective behind the USA’s first policy option was to
have a pro USA regime at Kabul. But the current peace talks between Afghan
Taliban and Kabul regime is an effort to include Afghan Taliban in the
government. Thanks to Afghan resistance, the future regime at Kabul has to be
Islamic regime, not a USA’s puppet. The USA employed many tactics to win over
Pakistan to its first policy option through creating bad blood between Pakistan
and Afghan Taliban. But Pakistan showed
tremendous resilience to stand against USA’s pressure and did not turn against
Afghan Taliban even in the face of series of bomb blasts carried out in
Pakistan’s cities by the terrorists. As mentioned, another objective of the
USA’s first policy option was to develop friendly diplomatic and economic
relations between Pakistan and India. As both India and USA wanted to create
Pak-India rapprochement by keeping Kashmir dispute at fence, Pakistan foiled
USA’s attempt to get Pakistan to develop close economic and friendly diplomatic
relations with India at the cost of Kashmir. As the basic objective behind the
USA’s first policy option was to create hurdle in the way of Political and
Economic Alliance likely to be emerged between China and regional Muslim
countries, China also countered USA’s policy by ending its historical inward
looking policy, and adopting an outward looking policy China played an
important role in foiling the USA’s policy objective by engaging Afghan Taliban
and facilitating peace process between Afghan Taliban and Kabul regime so that
Afghanistan may be integrated into likely emerging regional Alliance.
Now
that USA’s first policy option has been failed, USA may take on the second
policy option.
As
already mentioned, USA’s second policy option in Afghanistan aims at creating
bad blood between China and Afghan Taliban. When Afghan Taliban were under
unity of command, it was a really hard target to win over Afghan Taliban to
this second policy option; but death of Mulla Omar has eased the USA’s task.
After Omar’s death, Afghan Taliban have lost their unity of command, and some
Afghan groups may play in the USA’s hands which may employ such Afghan groups
to support or undertake militant activities in Muslim territory of China. This scenario
gets even more likelihood when we see that, in recent months, the central stage
of war in Afghanistan has been shifted from the south to the north which is
nearer to China border.
The
USA was most likely knowing of the death of Mulla Omar, but USA kept this news
in secrecy with the hope that Afghan Taliban, under pretended unity of command,
might come in terms with USA and Kabul regime-an exigency which was vital for
protecting USA’s regional interests; but when Afghan Taliban came into terms
with China as well, the USA realized they were losing the game, and China was
succeeding in bringing Afghanistan under its influence. It was the right time
for USA to take on the second policy option. Because pretended Afghan unity of
command had come into terms with China, it became necessary to divulge the news
of Mulla Omar’s death so that Afghan Taliban might be split apart and some
Afghan factions might be chosen by the USA to implement its second policy
option.
There
are many implications of USA’s second policy option for the region (continued).
No comments:
Post a Comment